22 March 2012

The Sophisticated Customer

One of the most frustrating challenges for anyone in a service industry is the customer who doesn’t really say what they want. How can you be expected to exceed their expectations, when they haven’t clearly articulated what those expectations are? Facilities people face this challenge all the time, but when the shoe is on the other foot, are we any better?

Facilities people are customers too. 

Procurement is a major function of Facilities Management. In small organisations a Facilities Manager might do all their purchasing by themselves. In larger organisation they may be able to draw upon the support of various experts; procurement managers, legal teams, etc.  These experts are a useful resource to the savvy FM, but at the end of the day, their expertise only extends to their subject matter: they can help you write a watertight contract, but they probably have no idea if it delivers the right level of service or not. Making sure that the service meets the requirements of the business is the FM’s job.

So how do we as Facilities professionals ensure that the deal we are being offered is going to deliver exactly what we want it to?  Well personally, I’ve always thought the best way to get exactly what you want, is to start by telling people exactly what you want.

Buying Smart

I first heard the phrase "Sophisticated Customer" from a supplier and I immediately took a liking to it. I think it's the perfect way to describe someone who approaches procurement in a precise and detailed way: someone who buys smart.  Let me explain.

Imagine you want to buy a car.

If you just stroll into the nearest car dealership and announce that you want to buy a car, you could be driving home in anything from a clapped-out ford Fiesta to a shiny new Porsche.  If you don’t have some idea what you’re looking for, the range of options could be confusing to say the least. 

Of course if you’re smart, you’ll think it through before hand; you’ll work out what you need this car to do, what sort of mileage you plan to do, etc, and the friendly salesman will be able to show you some options that don’t leave you having to stick one of the kids in the boot when you're doing the school run. 

However, the sophisticated customer will work out exactly what they want before they step out of the door.  If you’re buying smart, you’ll know what make and model of car you are looking for. You’ll have decided already if it’s got to have alloy wheels and a sunroof and you’ve probably picked out a fetching shade of metallic green.  Basically, you’ve got a specification.
The reason for using a specification is that it enables you to give the details of your dream car to a number of garages and then buy it from the one offering the best deal.  You get exactly what you want and you get it at the best price.

Getting Specific

Many Facilities professionals use specifications as part of the formal tender process, but there's nothing to stop them being used anytime you buy something and they can be used when buying almost anything. I’m surprised they don't get used more often.

So we've established you can use a specification for virtually anything, the question now is what you put in it. The answer quite simply is: as much as you can. In my time I've occasionally come across people trying to procure services using a generic specification. Maybe they've missed the point, but the clue should be in the name; the idea is to be specific.

As a customer, the more detailed your specification is, the more chance you’ll stand of getting what you want. There’s an old saying about what happens when you assume – I won’t repeat it here, but let me say instead: assume nothing. When I look to bring in a service or product, my specifications tend to cover anything and everything I can think of that might be relevant.

The most important aspect of course, is to include details about what you are looking to buy; what it is, how many, how big, what colour, etc.  But you don’t have to stop there.
You can choose to specify the process for proposal submission; you can include contact information, dates for submissions and procedures for preliminary visits and queries. You may wish to define terms about ownership of equipment (like keys, phones, IT equipment), security, intellectual property, qualifications of personnel, environmental standards, Service Level Agreements, etc, etc. The list is virtually endless.

If you’ve ever struggled to get the right paperwork after the job has been completed, you might think it’s worth stating up front, exactly what you expect to be delivered before the invoice gets paid. Talking of payment; maybe you don’t want to pay invoices on the supplier’s standard 14 day terms, maybe 30 day terms suit you better. As a general rule of thumb, if you’re very specific about what want, you can usually get it, albeit, at a premium.

Finding The Right People

A detailed specification can help you to identify good suppliers.

The extent to which a supplier takes the time to read and understand your brief (and it’s easy to spot those who haven’t) and is prepared to tailor their service to meet your requirements, demonstrates the value they place on your business. 

You might think that many suppliers would react quite negatively to such a dictatorial approach, but if you’ve never tried it before, you might just be surprised. In my experience, good suppliers like doing business with sophisticated customers. It’s fair; they know that they will be quoting like-for-like against other suppliers. If they don’t win your business, it’s either because they weren’t right for it or they weren’t competitive, not because they were undercut by someone offering a substandard service at a reduced rate. 

Any supplier signing up to a detailed specification starts out with a clear and detailed understanding of what the service expectations are. This knowledge can be used by them to meet and exceed those expectations, to develop a successful partnership and ultimately retain the business on a long-term basis.

If this sounds like the kind of supplier relationships you want to have, my advice to you, is be sophisticated and start asking for what you want.

7 comments:

  1. Jason,

    I agree that a detailed specification can help you to identify a good supplier. But sometimes if I have limited knowledge on a subject I'll start by creating a brief of my requirements. I may then choose to draw on expert knowledge from that particular area of the FM industry (experienced team members, consultants etc etc) as I understand that I can’t be a master in all areas.

    I sometimes find that using the tools around me can help me do a better job. The more I learn the more I understand how import experience is and having the right team around you..

    @Richard_ebims

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Richard, a very useful observation. I quite often involve suppliers in the specification process too, taking their good ideas and adding them to my spec. Whilst I'm not an expert in many of the areas, I believe that it is possible to up-skill to a reasonable level of expertise without too much difficulty by doing your homework and asking around.

      Jason

      Delete
  2. Interesting reading Jason, good to hear of your experiences.

    You might be interested in some of the experiences we've heard about in the initial discussion groups Workplace Law has organised in support of our research programme for ThinkFM 2012. I know you follow FM World online also, and I think I'm right in stating that their own recent discussion group (between FMs and purchasing professionals) highlighted similar issues.

    It's always struck me that some of the most sensible specifications are expressed in terms of output, as opposed to input. When central purchasing teams get involved, often being the party in the driving seat between suppliers and the potential client organisation, some of the feedback we've been getting is that it's all too easy for potential suppliers to cut corners in order to meet the sort of stringent cost-cutting measures that are required of them.

    So what happens in practice is that the FM sets the spec, the suppliers know exactly what's needed and have the skills and experience to deliver against it, the purchasing team put the pressure on re costs, and the bidding suppliers then have two choices: cut the service back to meet the reduced budget; or retain the commitment to meeting the output. In the case of the latter, they might accept a significantly reduced margin, they might (in practice) cut some corners, or they might end up reintroducing variable costs (perfectly legitimately) later on.

    The message that comes out so far is that FM service providers really do value the intelligent FM client, and if only they and the intelligent FM could discuss the client's requirements openly and in detail, between them they could make major progress in securing win-win agreements for both parties.

    The implication from this - still to be proved in a much larger online follow-up survey by Workplace Law - is that is some cases purchasing professionals effectively make the client less 'intelligent' - they are the gooseberry getting in the way of what could be a beautiful relationship.

    I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks David, excellent points all.

    Output is my preferred measure too. I want my office cleaned to a certain standard, whether that is best done by 2 cleaners working 3 hour shifts or 3 cleaners working 2 hour shifts is a question for the supplier.

    I will indeed be very interested to see the survey results. I personally think that Procurement can be a big help to FMs, but the FM needs to make it clear from the start that it is they who have accountability and they who should be the one calling the shots. Price is rarely the best way of measuring value and beating up your suppliers so that they have to slash right back on margins and wages just leads to misery all round. In the past I've actually excluded suppliers from tenders for having too low a margin or paying their staff too little. I want my suppliers to see my contract as a profitable excercise that they will pull out the stops to win and retain, not something that's barely worth the effort of managing.

    Jason

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Jason,
    the method you described, is exactly how i have purchased many items for the home and a mx5 some years ago.

    it could also be thought of the intelligent purchaser..

    I've also run the same regime in selecting suppliers and renegotiating sla's. Half the issue is getting the spec right, making sure it fits your needs and nothing has been left out.. scope etc... carry out gap analysis.

    The best phrase i have heard and utilised is "think that the clients budget is your own cash"

    then the fun starts, tender and negotiation.

    one thing i have noticed having worked for sodexo and BBW,that the service provider in both cases was missing contractual scope, IE not carrying out fully what was agreed with the client.
    in one instance, no monitoring of bms alarms from a data centre, and yeah, then it crashed and nobody knew, the client did though!! with lots of aggro being output'd to the service provider and rightly so.
    a quick solution of utilising e-mail o/p to blackberry's was quickly cobbled together to cover this issue from a reactive perspective.

    kind regards Louise
    @luise_g

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Louise,

    It's great to see others out there employing exactly the same techniques. I think I first discovered I was an intelligent customer at the age of 12. I wanted a mountain bike and spend literally weeks researching the best one I could get with the money from my paper-round. No mean feat in the pre-internet world of my childhood!

    Now of course we have access to so much more information, it should be much easier to be well informed. And as you've pointed out so elegantly in your examples - it's not till it goes wrong that you can look back and think "wouldn't it have been better if we wrote this down and agreed it".

    Jason

    ReplyDelete
  6. Which brings me to another early finding from our discussion groups, Jason ...

    So much information is available now, it's getting harder and harder to integrate it, analyse it and make decisions on it. I'm reading the recent Serviceworks/i-FM.net CAFM white paper with interest.

    ReplyDelete