Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts

7 November 2013

The Way We Do Things Around Here


In the search to find FM's value-add elements, Facilities Managers are often keen to talk about the extent to which FM can support the culture of an organisation. One frequently overlooked part of that discussion is the way that a skilled Facilities Manager can actually use the reach and influence of FM to drive cultural change.

For the uninitiated, the thing we refer to as “organisational culture” is a shared set of values and principles which tend to guide or influence the way in which the people within a particular organisation behave. You can think of it as being “the way we do things around here” and it varies a lot from one organisation to the next. 
 
 
Organisational culture is neither positive or negative though most organisations will have a culture that has some traits that they consider desirable and some that they do not. Some of these will be driven by the leadership style of the senior management (dynamic, hierarchical, by-the-book), others by the age, size and type of organisation (entrepreneurial, bureaucratic, risk-averse) and others still by the people within it (diverse, sociable, creative). There are numerous influencing factors and numerous possible combinations.

Aspiring to succeed

So why does everyone bang on about getting the right culture anyway? Quite simply; it's an economical way of getting more out of a finite resource. Or to put it another way; in tough economic times, it's far better to have a culture where people feel like work is a place they feel happy, a place they want to come to and something they want to do, rather than something they don't enjoy, somewhere they have to go and something they have to do.

But culture is more than just instilling a desire to work more productively: many organisations are switching on to the fact that they can achieve far greater success, by trying to develop their culture to contain more of the traits that make a positive contribution to their success and fewer of the ones with negative impact. For example, senior management might decide that the organisation might be more successful if staff felt more empowered in their work, or more connected to the success of the organisation; they might feel it is important that the organisation's customers see it as socially responsible or that potential new employees think of it as being cool. These are what we refer to as “cultural aspirations”.

The people who do things

Understanding that there is a difference between culture and cultural ambitions is key to understanding the way in which FM can influence cultural development. You see; the former is the way things are done around here, the latter is the way senior management would like things to be done. This is a really important distinction because “the way things get done around here” can be heavily influenced by the people that do those things and quite simply, FM generally does a lot of 'things'. The remit and influence of FM spans the entire organisation and it's activities touch on the working lives of every single person in the organisation: this gives a savvy Facilities Manager the opportunity to directly influence the way the culture develops through their choices and their team. Let me qualify that a little more: I'm not saying that the Facilities Manager has the power to make the organisation less bureaucratic, or more creative, but they do get to make simple choices such as shall I make more recycling facilities available, should we ask the catering team to hold some theme days or even, should I paint that wall orange instead of grey? These are little changes: they won't change the world overnight, but they will sow the seeds of an idea which has the potential to grow into a collectively shared principle or set of values. In other words: the culture.
 
 
At the heart of the matter

I’ve often argued that FM is the cultural heart of on organisation: and far more so than any other part. Organisational culture is something that develops around the water cooler. It develops in the tea-point, the break-out areas, around the reception desk and in the staff restaurant. These are the areas where the influence of FM is at its strongest.

In the organisational-family, it is the facilities people who are the matriarchs and patriarchs: they know everyone and everyone knows them. If there’s some kind of social or charitable event, you can bet they will be heavily involved.

Smart senior management, do understand the influence of FM and will try to gain the support of the Facilities Manger in propagating their cultural aspirations. Smart Facilities Managers, can use the influence of FM to gain credibility with senior management by supporting those cultural aspirations. Really smart Facilities Managers, can use the considerable influence of FM to align the direction of cultural development with their own values and vision: for example, increased sustainability, being socially responsible or providing a more service based approach.

The best things in life are free

It’s a commonly held assumption that changing an organisation’s culture is extremely difficult. In fact the reverse is true. Cultural changes are changes in attitudes, beliefs and behaviours. It costs nothing to change your beliefs, so in theory at least, cultural change is free. That's some very powerful added value.







12 May 2013

Dances With Wolves

If there existed such a thing as a Facilities Management rule book, it is generally held that rule number one would be “develop good relationships with your stakeholders”.  So why does the idea of engaging certain groups of stakeholders fill an FM with dread?  Let me explain using one of my favourite techniques: the animal simile.  Stakeholders are like wolves.

Those who know me well, know that I love a good simile. And no, that’s not a miss-spelling of smilie, although if you follow me on twitter (@JGurd) you’ll know that I also love a good smilie :)  . People are always saying that standards in education are declining, but ask any 8 year old what a simile is and quick as a flash they’ll tell you that it’s a figure of speech which is used to compare things to one another by using the words like or as. Pretty smart people, those kids and they even know a thing or two about smilies, but that’s digressing even more so I’ll try to get broadly back on track with the point I was making; I am particularly fond of the animal simile.  Through popular culture, childhood impressions, etc, we naturally endow certain animals with particular qualities or characteristics; lions are regal, mice are quiet, foxes are cunning and donkeys are well.........  well, let’s say fortunate.  And this is kind of my point, I haven’t said it, but you know exactly what I mean and this is why the animal simile works so well – the associations feel perfectly natural.  So let’s get back to my rather outlandish statement shall we? Not the one about donkeys, the other one.  Why is it tempting for a Facilities Manager to hide out in the plant room all day and avoid their stakeholders? Because stakeholders are like wolves.  Allow me to explain......



Regardless of how soft and furry it may appear on the outside, we instinctively understand that deep down  a wolf can be a fearsome predator, with sharp teeth, wicked claws and a killer instinct.  They might look a lot like man’s best friend, but they’re feral beasts and an unplanned or unexpected encounter with one and you could well end up with more than a few chunks being torn off. Basically, just like stakeholders.

Of course there are degrees of deadliness: The lone wolf, grizzled veteran of a thousand fights can be the most fearsome of all, but even a cub can take a finger if you’re not paying attention.  But worst of all, just like stakeholders, wolves are at their deadliest when they hunting in packs.
Almost all Facilities Managers will have at some time experienced that entering the lion’s den feeling that is a prelude to meeting with a large group of stakeholders.  They tend to be monthly meetings and I have a theory that I’m working on that it has something to do with lunar cycles – I can’t prove it, but mine mostly seem to fall on the same day as the full moon..........  Coincidence I’m sure.

As we step into that meeting, we know that we are going to be significantly outnumbered. It can feel like being circled by sharks and you know that as soon as they scent blood in the water, there’s going to be a feeding frenzy.  As you shuffle your agenda and your notes from the previous meeting, your pulse quickens and from somewhere deep down something primal pushes to the surface. Instinctively you prepare yourself for fight or flight.

So should you fight or should you flee?  Which is the best choice? Actually it’s neither. There is a third way which is all about getting your attitude right in advance as I’ll explain shortly, but first, let me try to explain why you should ignore that instinctive response.

Ok, so we wouldn’t actually fight in a meeting and probably wouldn’t go quite as far as running out the door screaming either, but in a modern day business context, you could think of them instead as going in all guns blazing or adopting a strategy of appeasement. 

Fighting it out can seem initially attractive. You can refuse to accept any criticism or blame, counter your opponent’s claims and blind them with science, etc. If you’re aggressive enough, you can probably even push the blame right back at them for failing to read the memo, not filling in the form, etc, etc.  If you go in all guns blazing, you’ll probably put the fear of god in them and they’ll never dare criticize you again which is a surely a good thing right? Well not really. It doesn’t actually work like that: if they don’t feel like they can talk to you, in the future, they’ll just go behind your back, around you or over your head. As an FM you almost certainly have the skills to win most of your battles, but FM is about cooperation not confrontation; what are you fighting for? If you’re trying to win hearts and minds, winning battles can cost you the war.

With that in mind, you might decide it’s just easier not to be confrontational at all. If you just give everyone whatever they ask for, they’ll all be perfectly happy and they will just leave you alone right?.  Well.... before you choose a strategy of appeasement, there’s something you should know: it didn’t work in the run up to the Second World War and it doesn’t work now.  Ultimately, demands are not always reasonable; if you agree to everything, eventually you’ll end up promising things you can’t deliver and your stakeholder frustration will increase.

So let’s talk about the other way instead.  Our ancestors learned how to domesticate the wolf and we too can learn to tame the stakeholder.  There are limits of course: they’re not going to chase sticks or retrieve your slippers, but it is definitely possible to develop mutually beneficial relationships and even get them working for you, being your eyes and ears and championing your causes. The key is getting the balance right; less fear, more respect, more confidence, less aggression. Most importantly of all, remember that communication is a two way process: if you give you should also take.



So how does that work in reality?  Well this blog was inspired by some advice I recently gave to a peer about stakeholder meetings which went something like this:  You should always participate in meetings as an equal: remember that you are there because of your skills, knowledge and expertise. Be confident but not aggressive:  you are not there as a punch bag and you are certainly not there to spend your time apologising for the level of service, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t listen and learn. Don’t be defensive; accept constructive feedback and never tell people that their experiences of the service are wrong – if someone is cold, no amount of telling them that they're not will make them any warmer or happier. If you can learn something from the things they tell you, you may be able to improve the service.  Most importantly, remember that communication is a two-way process; the pact you make with your stakeholders is that; in return for getting direct access to you to raise team complaints, you get to use them as a conduit for communicating information in the other direction.  And it doesn’t hurt to give a little constructive feedback of your own. After all, if you’ve listened to their views about the way the front desk works, then quid pro quo, you’re perfectly entitled to ask them to try and get their teams to be more considerate when using meeting rooms.  Finally, remember that, this is your opportunity to talk about the good things you’ve done and the good things coming up. It’s your chance to spread the vision.

So going back to wolves. As I mentioned earlier, like stakeholders they can be at their most effective when they work as a pack and with the right balance of attitude, respect and communications, you could find the pack working on your behalf; disseminating your message and spreading your vision.  And when that happens, the sight of the moon, full in the night sky will have you howling for joy, rather than trembling in fear.

31 January 2013

SLAs: A help or a hindrance?

A report from the debate at the 32nd FM Forum in Stansted

There was a sharp intake of breath from across the room as Liz Kentish posed her opening question in the debate about the usefulness of SLAs.  The assembled delegates looked around the room to find only two half-raised hands in response to the request about who would consider getting rid of their SLAs altogether.  One of those hands was mine, although I had only half-raised it – I’ll get to that bit later.



To be honest, our expectations going into the debate were quite modest. Being on as the last show of the day (and after the bar has opened) is not traditionally the best slot, but I’ll admit we were pleasantly surprised by the turnout and even more pleasantly surprised by the extent of audience participation. It would appear that SLAs are a contentious topic. In fact, this very report is a product of the ongoing interest we received after the debate.

I think it was a strong and diverse panel – that’s something that always helps a debate go well.  With myself (Jason Gurd) providing the client-side view, Robert Cunliffe the service-provider perspective, Adeyemi Adeboye providing expertise of operating PFI contracts. The debate was chaired by the BIFM Deputy Chair, Liz Kentish.

The panel put forward their cases and invited input from the audience.  There was some initial discussion about whether SLAs served any real purpose, with myself suggesting that most of us just settle for supplier’s out-of-the-box SLAs anyway. I’d already made the point that, getting to me in 4-hours wasn’t really all that impressive when you considered how far I could get from Stansted in 4-hours.

It was debated whether SLAs offer more protection to the client or the supplier, with cases being made for both sides. There were suggestions that SLAs were more often stick, than carrot, a get out-clause, if you like and the practicality of actually using that stick was also discussed. 

 Adeyemi and Robert both made strong cases for SLAs being a way to manage expectations and although there was a general consensus that they couldn’t replace a good client/supplier relationship, Adeyemi was able to use his knowledge of PFI to demonstrate that there are times when the client is significantly removed from the delivery.  This led to the almost inevitable question about whether FM is too procurement driven, followed by an equally inevitable round of “procurement-bashing”.  It was light-hearted, but I did step in to support our procurement colleagues by pointing out that it was down to FM’s to demonstrate leadership and influence in specifying services, but that we also need to make use of procurement functions to help us buy more effectively.

There was a lot of discussion about whether drawing a “line-in-the-sand” was a good thing when it came to service standards or not. I argued that, whilst there is a case for KPIs, continuous improvement demands that we seek to improve. Adeyemi countered by talking about the mechanisms which can allow SLAs to develop. 

There was also a great deal of discussion about whether SLAs could really enhance the client/supplier relationship, with Robert providing one of the most interesting examples of the night about how SLAs could be used to support organisational objectives, such as offering Local Authorities SLAs relating to creating local employment.

It was a pretty heated debate and I think most people were genuinely disappointed when it came to a close. I don’t think we managed to resolve the question, but I do think we managed to make a room full of FMs decide to think a lot harder about what SLAs they will ask from their suppliers in the future. 

To wrap this report off, I’d like to leave you with the closing thoughts of each of our panellists & chair;





Robert Cunliffe       
@robertcunliffe 
http://fmfuture.blogspot.co.uk/


“SLAs should be intertwined with KPIs and penalties or credits to ensure that the service provider has a framework to understand the quality expectations of the customer.  SLAs  & KPIs should not get in the way of building a good relationship between supplier and customer to further improve or enhance services so the customer is genuinely happy, however they provide a safety net should the relationship deteriorate.  To provide a true partnership SLAs and KPIs should focus on outcomes or the customer’s business priorities, as only then will the supplier really understand what the customer really, really wants.”






Adeyemi Adeboye 
@Yemmycornelius


“Forums like these, which bring the provider and the client together to discuss how the equilibrium of demand and supply of service agreements could be improved upon, is not only a necessity but a requirement for an enhanced and positive experience.  SLAs in this modern business age are here to stay: Whether you achieve your strategic goals and objectives will be down to how you structure your service level objectives in relation to your organisational goals."





Jason Gurd 

“Even I’m not enough of a maverick to completely dispense with SLAs all together, but I do think FMs should give serious thought to what SLAs they ask for and whether they really need to be accepting all of those out-of-the-box ones.  I would suggest you might get a better service if you dispensed with the majority of your SLAs and focussed on the ones that are really important to you.”

 




Liz Kentish (Chair)  
@FMCoach   


“I love it when FMs get together and talk about what works!  Our debate at the FM Forum demonstrated that there is of course a place for SLAs, but they must be regularly reviewed and amended when services change.  Key to service delivery and managing expectations is the relationship between the service provider and the client, whether in-house or not.  One of the courses we run is influencing skills and managing relationships, and the feedback is always that this is what really makes a difference - get it right, as an FM, and your life will be an awful lot easier!”

17 November 2012

Women In FM - An Inspiration to us all


It was a day that will stay with me for a very long time.  The message I posted on twitter that afternoon was short and simple, but I think it managed to capture exactly what everyone in the room was thinking. It was re-tweeted a number of times within minutes. It read simply this;  “I have a lot of new heroes today. Feel very humble and very inspired”.

On Wednesday 14th November 2012, I attended the “Lets Inspire” conference hosted by the Women In FM (WIFM) special Interest Group.   It was a day which promised much and delivered more.  This blog is not a report about the conference as such – that is something which others have already done far better than I ever could (I’ve included some links at the end of the post), but the conference did inspire me and this blog post is my way of sharing some of that experience with those who were unable to get a place. I like to think of it as paying it forward.


At least I didn’t have to shave my legs to get in

So let me address the obvious question first - how did I, a man, get to be at the WIFM conference?

Understandably, it was something I got asked quite a lot on the day.  The somewhat casual anecdote “by the time the message came through that skirts were optional, I’d already finished shaving one leg.........”  did get a few laughs, but the truth is much simpler: Whilst the members of WIFM are predominantly women, the group is really about promoting the FM industry and supporting diversity and inclusion within it; the fact that I’m a white male is not actually held against me........ that said, there is something of a running joke about the early days of FM which seem to have been populated almost entirely by hairy engineers called Geoff......... but I digress.

A far more interesting question is why did I, a man, want to be at the WIFM conference?  Well I’ll admit that the fantastic line-up was part of the draw.  It was great opportunity to hear from some wonderful speakers and to learn some fantastic new skills, but actually, it’s those WIFMs themselves that really draw me in.

It’s a fact that the FM industry is predominantly male, but ask anyone who the most influential people in the industry are and they’ll probably reel off the names of more women than men.  Some people might say it’s because they stand out more, but I personally believe it’s because they do more to promote and support the industry than many of their male counterparts. In an industry where promoting your cause and championing what you do is an essential skill, they’ve had to be best in the face of adversity, discrimination and sometimes outright hostility.  Throughout the morning and early afternoon, speaker after speaker got up on stage and reminded me why, when I go looking for FM role models, I so often find women.

The speakers on the day provided plenty of the inspiration that was promised.  A whole host of personal stories as well ideas and discussions on motivation, engagement, communication, inclusivity, confidence, coaching, etc, etc, left me feeling like the owner of a brand new toolkit and a bunch of fresh ideas.  I was inspired, but the best was still to come.

  What makes a hero?

As the afternoon wore on, two particular women took to the stage and made a roomful of people re-evaluate their lives. 




The first of these women was Diana Man, who lost both legs and the fingers of her right hand to meningococcal septicaemia five years ago.  I won’t describe her story in detail as there is really no way I can do it justice.



The second woman was Ismena Clout, who having been treated for breast cancer in 2004 was diagnosed with secondary breast cancer in 2010.  Again, Ismena’s story is best told by her.

What I do want to share is that both of these women received a standing ovation.  It was partly for their courage, partly for their strength and partly for their amazing positivity in the face of adversity, but it wasn't just that. The thing that really inspired me was the amazing way both women took their experiences and made a conscious decision that it wasn’t going to stop them from following their dreams, aiming higher, and achieving more.  Their incredible success is testament to just how well they’ve done that, with Diana becoming a presenter at the Paralympics (and currently training for the Paralympics dressage in 2016) and Ismena becoming the Chairman of the BIFM .

The word hero can be used a little too freely sometimes, but for both these women it’s entirely appropriate. Their outright refusal to settle with simply staying positive, when they could be aiming higher had me looking in the metaphorical mirror and asking myself “so what’s your excuse?”

More about the conference

For more info about the Women In FM “Let’s Inspire” conference, I recommend you take a look at the Cathy Hayward's and Martin Read’s blog posts below.

Inspired thought at the WIFM conference Cathy Hayward - Magenta Associates

Inspiration Stations Martin Read - FM World

5 October 2012

People ARE Facilities Management

Facilities are workplaces, buildings, installations........ premises. As Facilities Managers it can be tempting to think that our job is to look after these facilities. But is it? Some would say that our real job is to manage the people that look after them.

Over the past few weeks, it’s seemed like almost everything I’ve been involved in has served to remind me about the importance of people in FM.  Finally I felt so inspired, I decided to post a blog on the subject.  As a colleague of mine recently put it; this is a people business.  They were right of course, but when I sent this statement out on Twitter, I got an even better response which I couldn’t help but steal for my blog post title: People ARE Facilities Management. 

Everybody’s human

So, what started me thinking about the role of people in FM? Well I’ll get to that in a minute. First I want to share an anecdote. 


We recently had a visit at work from one of our top VIPs.  It’s a pretty rare event – the last being about three years back.  I’m talking about someone so far removed from a mere FM that I’d stand a better chance of getting an audience with God. 

Naturally, we wanted to put on a good show, so I assembled the whole team for a hotel-style walkthrough of the schedule and locations that might be visited to ensure readiness.  They really enjoyed the process and went at the task with relish. I thought it was a great success.
Afterwards, my cleaning supervisor took me to one side; concerned that I might be worried about the impending VIP visit.  “Don’t worry”, she told me, “she’s actually a lovely person and is always really nice to me”.  Being somewhat taken aback I enquired further.  It turns out, that this god-like executive often chatted to her from across the globe whilst she popped in to clear the video conference room between meetings.  And in fact, she made a point of talking to her during the visit too.  I think it’s a wonderful story and one I absolutely love to share, because it shows that whoever or whatever we are in work, at the end of the day we are all still human beings.

Back to basics

So where did my recent interest start? Well it started with a contract renewal.  We felt that there was some room for improvement with the existing service and decided to speak to some alternative providers.  We got an interesting spread of responses.  Some talked about cost, some about management, some impressed us with gadgets, but the ones that really fired our imaginations were those who talked about people.  The arguments were compelling; they would guarantee a better delivery of service by using the tried-and-tested  technique of working with their people and treating them well. They would encourage them, train them, share the vision with them, respect them and above all, ensure that they understood that their roles were pivotal to achieving success. It got us thinking; could it really be that easy? And we realised yes, it could.

The smallest cog in the wheel is usually the most important


What these suppliers were hinting at, was that it’s those who actually provide the service who are fundamental to its successful delivery, not those of us who sit behind desks making decisions or attending meetings.  In fact, whilst we attend meetings to make decisions about how things get done – other people are out there getting on with getting them done.  An important step in becoming a manager is the realisation that, regardless of how it might appear on the org-chart, you are generally much less vital to the day-to-day running of the organisation than anyone further down the heirarchy than you.  If your receptionist phones in sick, it disrupts your entire business; visitors don’t get the right instructions, vital calls are missed or badly handled and someone gets dragged from what they should be doing to provide cover.  On the other hand, if you phone in sick, the meetings just get postponed.

The role of the manager

I don’t think of myself as a great manager of people;  I only have a couple of years experience at it, so this post is not a "how-to" guide to management, as much as it is my thoughts on how good management is about recognising the role of people. I would say that I do recognise the importance of great management and I try my best to provide this to my team. I'm fortunate enough to have had some excellent managers in my time and have some first hand experience of great managers at work. Also thanks to my employers and the BIFM, I've been exposed to some great training and met a number of inspirational management guru’s and thought-leaders, whose experiences I've tried to draw on as much as possible. 

I see the role of the manager as being to get the very best out of those who work for them: to motivate and inspire and to provide them with the tools and resources they need to do the job in the best way possible.  In short, it’s our job to do what our people need, not the other way around.

It‘s also the role of the manager, to help their staff understand why we do the job and what we are trying to achieve. It was only a year or so ago, that I first heard the phrase “Management By Walking Around”, but it’s a technique that I’ve grown to love.  Talking the time to regularly connect and talk with your staff and contractors even for very short durations, gives you the opportunity not only to let them know that your time is not more valuable to you than they are and that you respect them as people, but it also gives you the opportunity to share and reinforce your vision – reminding people why it is important that we do things a certain way and getting their buy-in is fundamental to getting them done successfully.

The full circle

So going back to where this blog started.  Our VIP visit came and went and it was a roaring success.  Afterwards people said to me that I’d done a good job, but the truth is: I didn’t really do much at all.  Having cleared my diary to be on hand to support any emergencies or disasters, I spent much of the day twiddling my thumbs (metaphorically).  The reason for the success was the way the team came together. They all worked extremely hard on the day and in the run-up to it, to be in the right place at the right time, to ensure preparations were made and details were taken care of. In fact, if I’d have phoned in sick, I’m positive it would have still gone well. 

And what was my role in this? Quite simply to bring them together in the first place. To share my vision and help them do what they needed to do. And finally at the end of the day, to let them know just how well they’d done it and how proud of them I felt. And now, I’m letting the world know too.